diff --git a/docs/index.html b/docs/index.html
index 837f9b7..fd2e501 100644
--- a/docs/index.html
+++ b/docs/index.html
@@ -630,16 +630,16 @@ table 1: Nettime list's components (message, threads, replies) year by year
figure 3: Difference of the sum of threads and replies versus single messages
-According to our survey, it is fair to say that Nettime has become a more dialogical mailing list in the second decade of its existence, even if the number of messages in total have declined considerably during that time. Since 2006, the list steadily churns out, on average, more threads and replies than single messages posting; in other words, less announcements and more discussions/dialogs.
-The following chart (figure 5) shows an even more sustained trend that complements our observations, that is, the ratio of the number of replies per thread. This steady, and almost linear, increase over time of the number of replies to given threads show a certain 'maturity' of the list as it shows how Nettime dialogs are composed of an increasing number of messages and interlocutors.
+According to our survey, it is fair to say that Nettime has become a more dialogical mailing list in the second decade of its existence, and that, even if the number of messages in total have declined considerably during that time. Since 2006, the list steadily churns out, on average, more threads and replies than single messages posting; in other words, less announcements and more discussions/dialogs.
+The following chart (figure 5) shows an even more sustained trend that complements our observations, that is, the ratio of the number of replies per thread. This steady, almost linear, increase over time of the number of replies to given threads shows a certain 'maturity' of the list as it demonstrates how Nettime dialogs are composed of an increasing number of messages and interlocutors.
-There are, perhaps, many reasons that can explain this shift in the list's activities and behaviours (branching off of nettime-ann in 2005, the 'rise' of political activism since 2008, the list's subscribers knowing each other, etc.) our survey nonetheless observes a sustained trend towards Nettime developing a 'thread culture' as opposed to an earlier 'announcement culture'. Though, since we are not performing discourse analysis of the content of the list, it is impossible to correlate a shift of discourse which could, potentially, accompany such a shift of culture.
-Coming back to our notion of 'vigour' (as described in the previous section), our survey clearly demonstrates that Nettime is more vigourous then ever as it harbours more dialogs (threads and replies) on average than it did in its 'salad days'. While the subscription rate may have decreased in that last decade, Nettime, nonetheless, seems to have become an durable/stable dialogical space with increasing participation form its members.
+While there are many reasons that can explain this shift in the list's activities and behaviours (branching off of nettime-ann in 2005, the 'rise' of political activism since 2008, the list's subscribers knowing each other, etc.) our survey nonetheless observes a sustained trend towards Nettime developing a 'thread culture' as opposed to an earlier 'announcement culture'. Yet, since we are not performing discourse analysis of the content of the list, it is impossible to correlate a shift of discourse which could, potentially, accompany such a shift of culture.
+Coming back to our notion of 'vigour' (as described in the previous section), our survey clearly demonstrates that Nettime is more vigourous then ever, as it harbours more dialogs (threads and replies) on average than it did in its early 'salad days'. While the subscription rate may have decreased in the last decade, Nettime, nonetheless, seems to have become an durable/stable dialogical space that features an increasing amount participation from its members.
Outspokenness
-What messages have being discussed the most on Nettime? Who are the list's most prolific contributors in terms of (1) messages, (2) threads and (3) replies? In this section, we are interested in ranking messages and contributors according to their respective (brute) statistics derived from the archive. What follows is a set of self-explainable tables and figures that have been produced by these rankings.
+What messages have being discussed the most on Nettime? Who are the list's most prolific contributors in terms of (1) messages, (2) threads and (3) replies? In this section, we are interested in ranking messages and contributors according to their respective (brute) statistics derived from the archive. What follows is a set of self-explanatory tables and figures that have been produced with these statistics.
Activity (aka. messages)
diff --git a/docs/index.md b/docs/index.md
index 41db75c..9721199 100644
--- a/docs/index.md
+++ b/docs/index.md
@@ -119,19 +119,19 @@ What becomes clear from the chart above is how the ratio of replies and threads
-According to our survey, it is fair to say that Nettime has become a more dialogical mailing list in the second decade of its existence, even if the number of messages in total have declined considerably during that time. Since 2006, the list steadily churns out, on average, more threads and replies than single messages posting; in other words, less announcements and more discussions/dialogs.
+According to our survey, it is fair to say that Nettime has become a more dialogical mailing list in the second decade of its existence, and that, even if the number of messages in total have declined considerably during that time. Since 2006, the list steadily churns out, on average, more threads and replies than single messages posting; in other words, less announcements and more discussions/dialogs.
-The following chart (_figure 5_) shows an even more sustained trend that complements our observations, that is, the ratio of the number of replies per thread. This steady, and almost linear, increase over time of the number of replies to given threads show a certain 'maturity' of the list as it shows how Nettime dialogs are composed of an increasing number of messages and interlocutors.
+The following chart (_figure 5_) shows an even more sustained trend that complements our observations, that is, the ratio of the number of replies per thread. This steady, almost linear, increase over time of the number of replies to given threads shows a certain 'maturity' of the list as it demonstrates how Nettime dialogs are composed of an increasing number of messages and interlocutors.
-There are, perhaps, many reasons that can explain this shift in the list's activities and behaviours (branching off of nettime-ann in 2005, the 'rise' of political activism since 2008, the list's subscribers knowing each other, etc.) our survey nonetheless observes a sustained trend towards Nettime developing a 'thread culture' as opposed to an earlier 'announcement culture'. Though, since we are not performing discourse analysis of the content of the list, it is impossible to correlate a shift of discourse which could, potentially, accompany such a shift of culture.
+While there are many reasons that can explain this shift in the list's activities and behaviours (branching off of nettime-ann in 2005, the 'rise' of political activism since 2008, the list's subscribers knowing each other, etc.) our survey nonetheless observes a sustained trend towards Nettime developing a 'thread culture' as opposed to an earlier 'announcement culture'. Yet, since we are not performing discourse analysis of the content of the list, it is impossible to correlate a shift of discourse which could, potentially, accompany such a shift of culture.
-Coming back to our notion of 'vigour' (as described in the previous section), our survey clearly demonstrates that Nettime is more vigourous then ever as it harbours more dialogs (threads and replies) on average than it did in its 'salad days'. While the subscription rate may have decreased in that last decade, Nettime, nonetheless, seems to have become an durable/stable dialogical space with increasing participation form its members.
+Coming back to our notion of 'vigour' (as described in the previous section), our survey clearly demonstrates that Nettime is more vigourous then ever, as it harbours more dialogs (threads and replies) on average than it did in its early 'salad days'. While the subscription rate may have decreased in the last decade, Nettime, nonetheless, seems to have become an durable/stable dialogical space that features an increasing amount participation from its members.
##Outspokenness
-What messages have being discussed the most on Nettime? Who are the list's most prolific contributors in terms of (1) messages, (2) threads and (3) replies? In this section, we are interested in ranking messages and contributors according to their respective (brute) statistics derived from the archive. What follows is a set of self-explainable tables and figures that have been produced by these rankings.
+What messages have being discussed the most on Nettime? Who are the list's most prolific contributors in terms of (1) messages, (2) threads and (3) replies? In this section, we are interested in ranking messages and contributors according to their respective (brute) statistics derived from the archive. What follows is a set of self-explanatory tables and figures that have been produced with these statistics.
###Activity (aka. messages)
