haha! commit

This commit is contained in:
gauthiier 2016-07-08 14:53:57 +02:00
commit b5aa77380e
13 changed files with 304 additions and 0 deletions

53
+++/lestyle.css Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
body {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
.agent {
padding: 1.5em;
float: left;
margin: 1em;
width: 20em;
background-color: #eeeeee;
}
.card {
padding: 1.5em;
float: left;
display: inline;
margin: 1em;
width: 20em;
background-color: #eeeeee;
}
.card:hover {
background-color: #eeeeff;
}
.data {
margin-left: 0.5em;
}
.name {
font-weight: bold;
}
table {
width: 100%;
}
a.button {
margin: 0.3em;
text-align: center;
font-size: 0.8em;
-webkit-appearance: button;
-moz-appearance: button;
appearance: button;
text-decoration: none;
color: initial;
width: 100px;
height: 20px;
}

31
+++/style.css Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
body {
background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);
}
#ffframe {
padding: 3em;
}
text {
display: block;
width: 40em;
text-align: left;
}
img {
width: 40em;
}
li
{
padding: 0.3em;
}
fff img {
width: 40em;
margin-bottom: 20em;
}

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 9.6 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 54 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 486 KiB

View File

@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
> total nbr. posts
from posts
geert{at}xs4all.nl 883
patrice{at}xs4all.nl 710
tbyfield{at}panix.com 444
sondheim{at}panix.com 388
morlockelloi{at}yahoo.com 260
jya{at}pipeline.com 242
bhcontinentaldrift{at}gmail.com 213
bruces{at}well.com 199
brian.holmes{at}wanadoo.fr 190
jaromil{at}dyne.org 180
--
> total nbr. replies
from replies
geert{at}xs4all.nl 483
patrice{at}xs4all.nl 306
bhcontinentaldrift{at}gmail.com 223
felix{at}openflows.com 170
brian.holmes{at}wanadoo.fr 145
jaromil{at}dyne.org 128
tbyfield{at}panix.com 125
jya{at}pipeline.com 108
dk{at}telekommunisten.net 104
newmedia{at}aol.c 102
------------
from nbr-references subject url
date
2015-04-01 07:35:14 nettime{at}kein.org 48 <nettime> nottime: the end of nettim https://nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-1504/msg00001.html
2014-05-11 15:57:28 geert{at}xs4all.nl 35 <nettime> tensions within the bay area elites https://nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-1405/msg00018.html
2011-05-13 06:52:45 nak44{at}cornell.edu 34 <nettime> ISEA 2011 fees https://nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-1105/msg00055.html
2003-10-01 06:36:04 sdela{at}ahk.nl 29 Re: <nettime> A Puff Piece on Wikipedia (Fwd) https://nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-0310/msg00002.html
2006-06-06 19:51:17 tobias{at}techno.ca 29 <nettime> report_on_NNA https://nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-0606/msg00006.html
2016-02-12 21:33:21 geert{at}xs4all.nl 27 <nettime> notes from the DIEM25 launch https://nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-1602/msg00014.html
2012-08-27 13:21:03 nettime{at}kein.org 26 <nettime> crowd-funding on nettim https://nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-1208/msg00023.html
2012-05-03 08:43:01 bhcontinentaldrift{at}gmail.com 25 <nettime> The insult of the 1 percent: "Art-history majors" https://nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-1205/msg00004.html
2007-11-06 09:17:29 davidg{at}xs4all.nl 23 <nettime> Goodbye Classic ? https://nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-0711/msg00011.html
2009-05-11 21:29:14 geert{at}xs4all.nl 23 <nettime> Political Work in the Aftermath of the New Media Arts\tCrisis https://nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-0905/msg00038.html

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 82 KiB

35
figures/index.html Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="../+++/style.css"/>
<title>Nettime Survey</title>
</head>
<body>
<div id="ffframe" align="center">
<h1>Nettime Survey:</h1>
<h2>A History of Debates within Critical Internet Studies</h2>
<br>
<text>
<h3>Activity</h3>
<div class="fff">
<img src="activity-total-messages.png"/>
</div>
<h3>Vigour (replies within threads)</h3>
<div class="fff">
<img src="threads-replies-total.png"/>
<img src="threads-avg-replies.png"/>
<img src="threads-avg-replies-per-threads.png"/>
</div>
<h3>Outspokenness</h3>
<div class="fff">
<img src="activity-ranking-text.png" style="width: 25em;"/>
<br><br>
Nbr. messages per author (total)
<img src="activity-ranking.png"/>
<br><br><br>
Nbr. replies per message (total)
<img src="threads-ranking.png"/>
</div>
</text>
</div>
</body>

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 85 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 92 KiB

BIN
figures/threads-ranking.png Normal file

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 373 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 96 KiB

138
index.html Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="+++/style.css"/>
<title>Nettime Survey</title>
</head>
<body>
<div id="ffframe" align="center">
<h1>Nettime Survey:</h1>
<h2>A History of Debates within Critical Internet Studies</h2>
<img src="figures/Nettime.org-logo.png"/>
<br>
<text>
<a href="figures/index.html"> -- Survey -- </a>
<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>
This project aims to trace the evolution of debates with the field of critical Internet studies over the course of time through studying the Nettime mailing list.
</p>
<h2>Summary</h2>
<p>
While contemporary social media have been critiqued for their ephemeral effects on activist politics, the mailing list has proven an enduring venue for geographically dispersed communities to participate remain in dialogue over the course of decades. Founded in Amsterdam in 1995, the Nettime mailing list has played host to a community of activists and media artists and help to launch or establish the careers of a number of prominent new media theorists and Internet critics (including Geert Lovink, Lev Manovich, Matthew Fuller, Brian Holmes, Bruce Sterling, amongst others). Established in an era prior to the corporatization of the Web, over the course of its twenty years, Nettime has continued to discuss the Web in terms of the radical political possibilities with which it was imagined in its salad days.
</p>
<h2>Research Questions</h2>
<p>
<ul>
<li>List activity: As a mailing list, Nettime is popularly associated with mid-90s media activism, yet it continues to be active to this day.
<ul><li>When was Nettime most active?</li></ul>
</li>
<li>List vigour: A lists health may, perhaps, be seen as a function of the extent to which it is also a space for dialogue.
<ul><li>When was Nettime at its most dialogical?</li></ul>
</li>
<li>Outspokenness: Mailing lists like Nettime appear to be dominated by strong personalities.
<ul><li>Who have been Nettimes most prolific contributors?</li>
<li>and how might one begin to periodize the list in relation to those personalities?</li></ul>
</li>
</ul>
</p>
<h2>Methodology</h2>
<p>
The object of study is an archived mailing list, a web interface to which is available online <a href="https://nettime.org">nettime.org/archive.php</a>. The objective is to scrape all the data in order to query the database in relation to the research questions.
</p>
<h4><i>Data Gathering</i></h4>
<ul>
<li>
Tools are written in Python and can be found...
</li>
<li>
Consistent with the 90s-era origins of the Nettime list, time series data analytics were graphed in a series of simple bar graph.
</li>
</ul>
<h4><i>Visualization</i></h4>
<ul>
<li>
Consistent with the 90s-era origins of the Nettime list, time series data analytics were graphed in a series of simple bar graph.
</li>
</ul>
<h2>Findings</h2>
<p>
In consultation with Geert Lovink, one of the lists founders -- and the most prolific poster, by far -- we discussed our data and identified a few unexpected patterns, namely:
</p>
<ul>
<li>
that, when assessed in terms of the number of posts over time (list activity), that:
<ul>
<li>
the list paradoxically grew in 2000 subsequent to its having become a moderated list -- a major controversy, famously chronicled by Lovink (03)
</li>
<li>
that, as expected, the list activity diminished in 2004 -- which coincided with the birth of social media, and blogs
</li>
<li>
that there was a spike in activity in 2011, that could be explained as corresponded with the global surge in activism in that same year
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
that, when assessed in terms of relative number of replies over time (list vigour), that:
<ul>
<li>
Nettime has steadily become a more dialogical space
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
that, when assessed in terms of the most prolific contributors over time (outspokenness), that:
<ul>
<li>
different figures can be seen to be dominated the years and that, presumably this might offer an entry-way into periodizing the times of Nettime
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h2>Further Research</h2>
<ul>
<li>
To our mind the content of the posts and conversations in Nettime is, in fact, what makes this list of particular interest from the perspective of new media studies. To this end, future work could analyse the content of the list, filtering twenty years of posts, in order, for example, to identify the most controversial. Another interesting question has to do with periodizing the eras or times of Nettime, in terms of who were the dominant figures in different periods and how might they have clustered into cohorts.
</li>
</ul>
<h2>Keywords</h2>
<p>media art history, mailing list analysis, media activism, mapping debate</p>
<h2>Team Members</h2>
<p>David Gauthier, Marc Tuters</p>
<h2>References</h2>
<p>Geert Lovink <em>Dark Fiber: Tracking Critical Internet Culture.</em> MIT Press: Cambridge: MIT Press, 2003.
</text>
</div>
</body>
</html>