gauthiier/Full_digest_rescheduled
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

xml ok

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
gauthiier 2020-01-20 06:30:11 +01:00
parent 036b549e75
commit cabfe50777
15 changed files with 3252 additions and 4319 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

1
.gitattributes vendored Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1 @@
*.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text

27
erratum/notes.txt
View File

@ -7,3 +7,30 @@
+ 22.29 -- empty...
+ email address in from -- 25.2 auskadi {AT} tvcabo.co.mz
+ text formating -- 19.0 p.182
- Ch. 4.net.art
+ 2.0 p.211 should be 3.0
+ jump 4.5 - 4.9
- Ch 5.Netzkritik
+ 0.0 Critical Art Ensembl -> Critical Art Ensemble
+ 11.0 submission to nettime lis -> submission to nettime list
- Ch 6.FLOSS
+ jump 0.1 - 0.4
+ 5.0 he Fading Altruism of Open Sourcece Developmen -> he Fading Altruism of Open Source Development
- Ch 8. Tactical
+ 26.0 Media without an Audien -> Media without an Audience
- Ch 9.List talking to List
+ 13.0 choose-your-own adventure: a brief history of nettim -> choose-your-own adventure: a brief history of nettime
- Ch 11. CODE
+ 5.5 should be 6.5
- CH 14.MANIFESTO
+ duplicate 3.1 + 3.2
- CH 15. Luther
+ 11.0 An Attack on the Commercialization of Web Ar -> An Attack on the Commercialization of Web Art

BIN
images/PIC.png (Stored with Git LFS) Normal file
View File

Binary file not shown.

62
xml/10.Cyberfeminism.xml
View File

@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ The game of communication
VNS Matrix is also trying to investigate in what way the game is a symbol of
social interaction in cultural life. Is pleasure an important condition to
experience art? Interactivity gives one the power to interfere in a work of
art. The non feminist artist Agnes Hegedüs sees the new media as an
art. The non feminist artist Agnes Hegedüs sees the new media as an
interesting territorium for investigation in the field of social
interaction. In the new media raises a new culture of games, that is both
interactive and telematic. She thinks it is special that everyone can pick a
@ -84,13 +84,13 @@ seduction of being connected on a distance is addicting, but the mysterious
rendez-vouses of people gives a sexy kick. On internet people can meet
eachoter without being seen, they can pretend to be anyone in any way.
Hegedüs' "Televirtual Fruitmachine" from 1994 is based on this playful
Hegedüs' "Televirtual Fruitmachine" from 1994 is based on this playful
interactive aspect. De instalation is a big screen on which three puzzle
pieces of a fruit machine are projected. In front of the screen are three
tables with a joystick. Three different people can join into this game at
the same time. The fruit is refering to the forbidden fruit from Paradise
and seduction. In contrast with VNS Matrix, who wants to see the new digital
world dominated by women, Hegedüs does not think that is necessary. When the
world dominated by women, Hegedüs does not think that is necessary. When the
man and woman identity can be swapped in the virtual space, the
genderidentity will be less important. The idea of genderswap with the help
of the media was allready being issued by Marcel Duchamp, who let himself
@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ themselves anymore, but have to look like Barbie.
Bitter Herb Menu/Brutal Myths
'The cosmedical industry is a form of keeping women surpressed" claim the
american artists Sonya Rapoport and Marie José Sat. The reason why men
american artists Sonya Rapoport and Marie José Sat. The reason why men
dominate women is because they are scared of them. That is why women were
called witch. "The firsts woman Eve was allready called bad and even the
most evil woman that has ever lived" is one of the ancient myths that was
@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ that. Sonya Rapoport sees the web as free and easy to give a presentation
from feministic art. She hopes to reach also people who would otherwise
never go to an exhibition. She is striving to a kind of common ground: a
virtual space linked to different female artists. The dutch artist Mathilde
Mupé has allready made links on her homepage to different feminists in
Mupé has allready made links on her homepage to different feminists in
cyberspace. The german video artist Ulrike Rosenbach and the american art
critic Lucy Lippard have allready set up feministic art institutes in the
seventies where female artists could cooperate.
@ -720,7 +720,7 @@ degree are committed by men!
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>0.18</nbr>
<nbr>0.8</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; Translation: The vagina is the boss on intern</subject>
<from>Josephine Bosma</from>
<to>nettime-l@desk.nl</to>
@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ J
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>0.19</nbr>
<nbr>0.9</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; Translation: The vagina is the boss on intern</subject>
<from>Will French</from>
<to>nettime-l@desk.nl</to>
@ -793,7 +793,7 @@ Will French &lt;wfrench {AT} interport.net&gt;
<content>Just wondering how many people are aware of the cyberfeminist origins of this list: Melinda Rackham who started empyre was a contemporary of the whole VNS Matrix, cyberfeminist and netizens crowd. Check out this early work from 1996 (she actually cared enough to switch the java to html in 2014 - that is dedication to preserving history!):
Tunnel, http://www.subtle.net/tunnel/lindex.html
It’s amazing how current or at least ‘revived' the graphic feel is!
It&#8217;s amazing how current or at least &#8216;revived' the graphic feel is!
cheers
Anna
</content>
@ -804,26 +804,26 @@ Anna
<from>Anna Munster</from>
<to>&lt;empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au&gt;</to>
<date>Sun Sep 18 08:04:43 AEST 2016</date>
<content>I’ve really been enjoying the discussion on net art and finance but I did say I was going to use a three-way prism to think about ‘then’ and ‘now’. I thought I’d start another thread to pick up a discussion on feminism and net art.
<content>I&#8217;ve really been enjoying the discussion on net art and finance but I did say I was going to use a three-way prism to think about &#8216;then&#8217; and &#8216;now&#8217;. I thought I&#8217;d start another thread to pick up a discussion on feminism and net art.
What I’m really interested in here is the ‘return’ of feminism in the last couple of years, generally, accompanied by a younger generation of artists and poets’ interest in feminist digital/net.art from the ‘90s. I’m not sure how generalisable this is - perhaps it’s a bit more specific to Australia. But here’s an example:
What I&#8217;m really interested in here is the &#8216;return&#8217; of feminism in the last couple of years, generally, accompanied by a younger generation of artists and poets&#8217; interest in feminist digital/net.art from the &#8216;90s. I&#8217;m not sure how generalisable this is - perhaps it&#8217;s a bit more specific to Australia. But here&#8217;s an example:
Then: VNS Matrix: http://vnsmatrix.net/
Now: Xenofeminism: A Politics for Alienation: Laboria Cuboniks,http://www.laboriacuboniks.net/#firstPage
I am taking liberties with the term ‘net art’ here. VNSMatrix were not strictly ‘net.artists’. Nonetheless, their presence with net culture in the ‘90s – they inhabited Lambdamoo, were active participants around discussions on net art and net critique on ‘nettle’, set up ‘recode’, a list that discussed net critique and net art in an Australian context, and were individually involved in net art projects such as ‘doll yoko’:http://dollyoko.thing.net/
I am taking liberties with the term &#8216;net art&#8217; here. VNSMatrix were not strictly &#8216;net.artists&#8217;. Nonetheless, their presence with net culture in the &#8216;90s &#8211; they inhabited Lambdamoo, were active participants around discussions on net art and net critique on &#8216;nettle&#8217;, set up &#8216;recode&#8217;, a list that discussed net critique and net art in an Australian context, and were individually involved in net art projects such as &#8216;doll yoko&#8217;:http://dollyoko.thing.net/
Interestingly, the recently reformed for their 25 year anniversary to do a live one-off performance in 2015.
Likewise ‘Xenofemism’ is not a net.art project as one might traditionally think net.art. BUT it consciously traces a lineage to VNSMatrix and the ‘performance’ of online and cyber identities. In some ways, we could call it contemporary networked anti-performance art (ooo even I am gagging at that mouthful of a moniker!).
Likewise &#8216;Xenofemism&#8217; is not a net.art project as one might traditionally think net.art. BUT it consciously traces a lineage to VNSMatrix and the &#8216;performance&#8217; of online and cyber identities. In some ways, we could call it contemporary networked anti-performance art (ooo even I am gagging at that mouthful of a moniker!).
Why I find it interesting is that it continues to push and explore the important relation that so much cyberfeminist and net feminist (art)practice of the ‘90s brought to light: the network and identity.
Why I find it interesting is that it continues to push and explore the important relation that so much cyberfeminist and net feminist (art)practice of the &#8216;90s brought to light: the network and identity.
Whereas VNS Matrix located a network culture ‘erected’ on the exclusion and subjugation of the female body, Laboria Cuboniks radically engage with the re-formation of identity itself under the conditions of contemporary networks:
Whereas VNS Matrix located a network culture &#8216;erected&#8217; on the exclusion and subjugation of the female body, Laboria Cuboniks radically engage with the re-formation of identity itself under the conditions of contemporary networks:
'If ‘cyberspace’ once offered the promise of escaping the strictures of essentialist identity categories, the climate of contemporary social media has swung forcefully in the other direction, and has become a theatre where these prostrations to identity are performed’ (from the Xenofemism manifesto)
'If &#8216;cyberspace&#8217; once offered the promise of escaping the strictures of essentialist identity categories, the climate of contemporary social media has swung forcefully in the other direction, and has become a theatre where these prostrations to identity are performed&#8217; (from the Xenofemism manifesto)
Perhaps what both the ‘then’ and the ‘now’ of feminist ‘net' art have in common is a desire to ‘un-perform’ the network?
Perhaps what both the &#8216;then&#8217; and the &#8216;now&#8217; of feminist &#8216;net' art have in common is a desire to &#8216;un-perform&#8217; the network?
Thoughts? Misgivings?
</content>
@ -1138,9 +1138,9 @@ The Cyborg (sweet sixteen and never been cloned)
In an era when nearly everything, from small seeds to large computer
networks, entails practical or metaphorical organic and machinic fusions,
the ‘cyborg’, that product of early Cold War cybernetic theory, and
the &#8216;cyborg&#8217;, that product of early Cold War cybernetic theory, and
detourned by Haraway a generation later, has lost its political
clout. Haraway’s cyborg, ‘not of woman born’, the illegitimate offspring
clout. Haraway&#8217;s cyborg, &#8216;not of woman born&#8217;, the illegitimate offspring
of militarism and patriarchal capitalism, was modeled upon the
meztisaje (racial mixing) of Mexican Americans. Acknowledging that
she wrote the piece at a particular historical moment and primarily
@ -1163,13 +1163,13 @@ control strategies applied to women to give birth to new human beings
would be developed using the language "of goal achievement for
individual decision-makers" had, by the 1990s, become painfully
clear.
 
&#160;
2. CM urged feminists to embrace new technologies as tools for feminist
ends. This was a pressing antidote to the pernicious notion, popular at
the time, that women belonged exclusively to ‘nature’. The manifesto
proposed that feminists definitely could and should use the master’s
tools to destroy (or at least disrupt) the master’s house.
 
the time, that women belonged exclusively to &#8216;nature&#8217;. The manifesto
proposed that feminists definitely could and should use the master&#8217;s
tools to destroy (or at least disrupt) the master&#8217;s house.
&#160;
3. CM contributed to the growth of a pan-global labor consciousness,
acknowledging the key role of women as workers in the global economy. It
also inspired the development of cyberfeminism in various parts of the
@ -1187,17 +1187,17 @@ Haraway wrote the manifesto in response to endless fragmentation of the
US Second Wave feminist movement along the lines of ethnic, racial and
sexual identity. The manifesto called for the crossing of boundaries and
for a re-organisation of women on the basis of affinities of political
kinship. Cyberfeminists followed Haraway’s lead to associate on the basis
kinship. Cyberfeminists followed Haraway&#8217;s lead to associate on the basis
of affinities but at present, with some exceptions, these affinities tend
to be career-oriented rather than political.
 
&#160;
5. CM reinforced and popularised earlier utopian feminist imaginings
of a world rendered gender free by technology. Effectively, what this
really meant was that those who could afford medical services and
technology would be able to 're-generate' themselves at will. For a small
segment of the world’s population this has indeed been liberating and
empowering. Previously ‘monstrous’ prosthesis became beautiful. 
If the original radicality of Haraway’s cyborg lay in its illegitimacy,
segment of the world&#8217;s population this has indeed been liberating and
empowering. Previously &#8216;monstrous&#8217; prosthesis became beautiful.&#160;
If the original radicality of Haraway&#8217;s cyborg lay in its illegitimacy,
the ubiquity of digital, ex-military, and genetic technologies suggest
that the cyborg is now a recognised legal citizen, much more a creature
of social reality than of fiction. The utilisation of the cyborg as an
@ -1233,10 +1233,10 @@ liberal societies in (post)modernity.
The cyborg is yet another manifestation of the collapse of the
traditional bounded stability of the human and its anthropocentric
beliefs. But this notion of the cyborg is a lazy reconfiguration of
already well-established political and moral sensibilities 
already well-established political and moral sensibilities&#160;
why?
1.      It
1.&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;It
duplicitously welcomes the technoscientific hybridisation of the organic
and the technical while maintaining and perpetuating the critique of
technological rationality which has characterised left-liberal activism
@ -3031,7 +3031,7 @@ the change. This presence needs to be a noticeable and clear one.
Josephine Starrs of VNS Matrix mentioned, when asked which women had
influenced her, the French philosophers Irigaray and Kristeva. Their
'écriture feminine' has a radical approach to language as a liberation
'&#233;criture feminine' has a radical approach to language as a liberation
tool. When asked if she sees different styles in discourse between men and
women online Josephine Starrs says: "..I am thinking now of one of VNS
Matrix: Francesca Da Rimini aka Gashgirl, ...her writing is particularly

758
xml/11.CODE.xml
View File

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff

57
xml/13.Post-digital.xml
View File

@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ Turfdraagsterpad 9
http://home.medewerker.uva.nl/m.j.dieter/</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>1.2</nbr>
<nbr>1.4</nbr>
<subject>[-empyre-] empyre Digest, Vol 111, Issue 5</subject>
<from>micha c&#225;rdenas</from>
<to>&lt;empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au&gt;</to>
@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ thank you,
micha</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>1.3</nbr>
<nbr>1.5</nbr>
<subject>[-empyre-] empyre Digest, Vol 111, Issue 5</subject>
<from>Florian Cramer</from>
<to>&lt;empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au&gt;</to>
@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ mathematics, for that matter).
Florian</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>1.4</nbr>
<nbr>1.6</nbr>
<subject>[-empyre-] empyre Digest, Vol 111, Issue 5</subject>
<from>micha c&#225;rdenas</from>
<to>&lt;empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au&gt;</to>
@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ cheers,
micha</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>1.5</nbr>
<nbr>1.7</nbr>
<subject>[-empyre-] empyre Digest, Vol 111, Issue 5</subject>
<from>micha c&#225;rdenas</from>
<to>&lt;empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au&gt;</to>
@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ thanks all,
micha</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>1.6</nbr>
<nbr>1.8</nbr>
<subject>[-empyre-] empyre Digest, Vol 111, Issue 5</subject>
<from>Florian Cramer</from>
<to>&lt;empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au&gt;</to>
@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ matter whether it's digital or not.
-F</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>1.7</nbr>
<nbr>1.9</nbr>
<subject>[-empyre-] empyre Digest, Vol 111, Issue 5</subject>
<from>Robert Jackson</from>
<to>&lt;empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au&gt;</to>
@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ Cheers
Rob</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>1.8</nbr>
<nbr>1.10</nbr>
<subject>[-empyre-] empyre Digest, Vol 111, Issue 5</subject>
<from>Alan Sondheim</from>
<to>&lt;empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au&gt;</to>
@ -529,7 +529,7 @@ participants.
- Alan</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>1.9</nbr>
<nbr>1.11</nbr>
<subject>[-empyre-] empyre Digest, Vol 111, Issue 5</subject>
<from>micha c&#225;rdenas</from>
<to>&lt;empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au&gt;</to>
@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ since i was there, which is, like you said, informal and exploratory. but
good to share that with everyone else...</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>1.10</nbr>
<nbr>1.12</nbr>
<subject>[-empyre-] empyre Digest, Vol 111, Issue 5</subject>
<from>Michael Dieter</from>
<to>&lt;empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au&gt;</to>
@ -581,7 +581,7 @@ Turfdraagsterpad 9
http://home.medewerker.uva.nl/m.j.dieter/</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>1.11</nbr>
<nbr>1.13</nbr>
<subject>[-empyre-] empyre Digest, Vol 111, Issue 5</subject>
<from>Alessandro Ludovico</from>
<to>&lt;empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au&gt;</to>
@ -1816,15 +1816,6 @@ outstanding work of relational publishing performance. Starting here &gt; &gt;
http://www.postartpoets.com/</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>4.3</nbr>
<subject>[-empyre-] HYBRID BOOKWORK, Week Two - Paradoxical Publishing, Postmedia, Critical Aesthetics</subject>
<from>Rita Raley</from>
<to>&lt;empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au&gt;</to>
<date>Thu Feb 13 16:39:25 EST 2014</date>
<content>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: &lt;http://lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au/pipermail/empyre/attachments/20140212/cd6ad14e/attachment.htm&gt;</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>5.0</nbr>
<subject>[-empyre-] post-digital print</subject>
<from>S&#248;ren Pold</from>
@ -2838,7 +2829,7 @@ or anything bad about new capital is old bad?
or my bad?</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>6.9</nbr>
<nbr>6.10</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; Hans Magnus Enzensberger: Rules for the digital world</subject>
<from>Heiko Recktenwald</from>
<to>nettime-l@kein.org</to>
@ -2860,7 +2851,7 @@ fun by provocations).
Best, H.</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>6.10</nbr>
<nbr>6.11</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; Hans Magnus Enzensberger: Rules for the digital world</subject>
<from>Florian Cramer</from>
<to>nettime-l@kein.org</to>
@ -3040,7 +3031,7 @@ the Internet is their infrastructure.
-F</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>6.11</nbr>
<nbr>6.12</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; Hans Magnus Enzensberger: Rules for the digital world</subject>
<from>Frank Rieger</from>
<to>nettime-l@kein.org</to>
@ -3066,7 +3057,7 @@ Greetings from Berlin,
Frank Rieger</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>6.14</nbr>
<nbr>6.13</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; Hans Magnus Enzensberger: Rules for the digital world</subject>
<from>morlockelloi</from>
<to>nettime-l@kein.org</to>
@ -3104,7 +3095,7 @@ trust and begging the authorities to stop what they are doing is a
total waste of time.</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>6.15</nbr>
<nbr>6.14</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; Hans Magnus Enzensberger: Rules for the digital world</subject>
<from>Armin Medosch</from>
<to>nettime-l@kein.org</to>
@ -3126,7 +3117,7 @@ best,
Armin</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>6.16</nbr>
<nbr>6.15</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; Hans Magnus Enzensberger: Rules for the digital world</subject>
<from>Armin Medosch</from>
<to>nettime-l@kein.org</to>
@ -3146,7 +3137,7 @@ regards
Armin</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>6.17</nbr>
<nbr>6.16</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; Hans Magnus Enzensberger: Rules for the digital world</subject>
<from>Roel Roscam Abbing</from>
<to>nettime-l@kein.org</to>
@ -3193,7 +3184,7 @@ deportation to concentration camps.
http://monoskop.org/log/?p=3076</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>6.18</nbr>
<nbr>6.17</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; Hans Magnus Enzensberger: Rules for the digital world</subject>
<from>mp</from>
<to>nettime-l@kein.org</to>
@ -3227,7 +3218,7 @@ And then you throw "great social scientists" into the mix, too?!? Who
are they?</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>6.19</nbr>
<nbr>6.18</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; Hans Magnus Enzensberger: Rules for the digital world</subject>
<from>dan</from>
<to>nettime-l@kein.org</to>
@ -4335,7 +4326,7 @@ glued to the rearview mirror?
Keith</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>7.6</nbr>
<nbr>7.8</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; Post-digital</subject>
<from>kontakt |&#160;florian kuhlmann</from>
<to>nettime-l@kein.org</to>
@ -4370,7 +4361,7 @@ skype florian_kuhlmann
--- -- -</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>7.7</nbr>
<nbr>7.9</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; Post-digital</subject>
<from>mp</from>
<to>nettime-l@kein.org</to>
@ -4410,7 +4401,7 @@ Ever been in an Indian phone centre? Now that'a a buzzing place..
mp</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>7.8</nbr>
<nbr>7.10</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; Post-digital</subject>
<from>Griffis, Ryan</from>
<to>nettime-l@kein.org</to>
@ -4441,7 +4432,7 @@ Best,
ryan</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>7.9</nbr>
<nbr>7.11</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; Post-digital</subject>
<from>John Hopkins</from>
<to>nettime-l@kein.org</to>
@ -4492,7 +4483,7 @@ http://tech-no-mad.net/blog/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>7.22</nbr>
<nbr>7.12</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; Post-digital</subject>
<from>d.garcia</from>
<to>nettime-l@kein.org</to>

1012
xml/14.MANIFESTO.xml
View File

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff

213
xml/15.LutherBlissett.xml
View File

@ -581,7 +581,7 @@ http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Rampart/6812
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>5.0</nbr>
<nbr>4.0</nbr>
<subject>&lt;nettime&gt; Oz's talking about Luther Bliss</subject>
<from>Luther Blissett Project Newz</from>
<to>nettime-l@bbs.thing.net</to>
@ -889,7 +889,7 @@ Luther Blissett and Kommunikationsguerilla - German
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>5.1</nbr>
<nbr>4.1</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; Oz's talking about Luther Bliss</subject>
<from>Nmherman</from>
<to>nettime-l@bbs.thing.net</to>
@ -974,7 +974,7 @@ www.geocities.com/~genius-2000
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>5.2</nbr>
<nbr>4.2</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; Oz's talking about Luther Bliss</subject>
<from>Luther Blissett Project Newz</from>
<to>nettime-l@bbs.thing.net</to>
@ -1047,7 +1047,7 @@ Luther Blissett and Kommunikationsguerilla - German
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>5.3</nbr>
<nbr>4.3</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; Oz's talking about Luther Bliss</subject>
<from>Luther Blissett Project Newz</from>
<to>nettime-l@bbs.thing.net</to>
@ -1120,7 +1120,7 @@ Luther Blissett and Kommunikationsguerilla - German
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>6.0</nbr>
<nbr>5.0</nbr>
<subject>&lt;nettime&gt; Is Watford in Ireland?</subject>
<from>Luther Blissett Project Newz</from>
<to>nettime-l@bbs.thing.net</to>
@ -1322,7 +1322,7 @@ android, go to:
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>7.0</nbr>
<nbr>6.0</nbr>
<subject>&lt;nettime&gt; Holy Child kidnapped by LB!!!</subject>
<from>Luther Blissett</from>
<to>nettime-l@bbs.thing.net</to>
@ -1432,7 +1432,7 @@ Luther Blissett and Kommunikationsguerilla - German
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>8.0</nbr>
<nbr>7.0</nbr>
<subject>&lt;nettime&gt; Seppuku!</subject>
<from>Luther Blissett</from>
<to>nettime-l@bbs.thing.net</to>
@ -1542,7 +1542,7 @@ Luther Blissett and Kommunikationsguerilla - German
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>9.0</nbr>
<nbr>8.0</nbr>
<subject>&lt;nettime&gt; Heise and the truth about LB's seppuk</subject>
<from>Luther Blissett</from>
<to>nettime-l@bbs.thing.net</to>
@ -1741,7 +1741,7 @@ Luther Blissett and Kommunikationsguerilla - German
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>9.1</nbr>
<nbr>8.1</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; Heise and the truth about LB's seppuk</subject>
<from>Ashley</from>
<to>nettime-l@bbs.thing.net</to>
@ -1818,7 +1818,7 @@ p.s. Will the Reverend William Cooper be taking care of your funeral?
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>9.2</nbr>
<nbr>8.2</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; Heise and the truth about LB's seppuk</subject>
<from>Luther Blissett</from>
<to>nettime-l@bbs.thing.net</to>
@ -1912,7 +1912,7 @@ Luther Blissett and Kommunikationsguerilla - German
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>10.0</nbr>
<nbr>9.0</nbr>
<subject>&lt;nettime&gt; The mask of Zorro</subject>
<from>Luther Blissett</from>
<to>nettime-l@bbs.thing.net</to>
@ -1962,7 +1962,7 @@ Luther Blissett and Kommunikationsguerilla - German
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>11.0</nbr>
<nbr>10.0</nbr>
<subject>&lt;nettime&gt; CD: Luther Blissett Tri</subject>
<from>Luther Blissett</from>
<to>nettime-l@bbs.thing.net</to>
@ -2088,7 +2088,7 @@ Luther Blissett, *The Rosicrucian Book* 1984
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>12.0</nbr>
<nbr>11.0</nbr>
<subject>&lt;nettime&gt; An Attack on the Commercialization of Web Ar</subject>
<from>Luther Blissett</from>
<to>nettime-l@bbs.thing.net</to>
@ -2276,7 +2276,7 @@ Vuk Cosic's DocumentaX
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>13.0</nbr>
<nbr>12.0</nbr>
<subject>&lt;nettime&gt; Anti-copyright stance of *Q*'s authors</subject>
<from>Luther Blissett</from>
<to>nettime-l@bbs.thing.net</to>
@ -2359,7 +2359,7 @@ http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/index.htm
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>14.0</nbr>
<nbr>13.0</nbr>
<subject>&lt;nettime&gt; Klasse Kriminale &amp; Luther Bliss</subject>
<from>Luther Blissett</from>
<to>nettime-l@bbs.thing.net</to>
@ -2451,7 +2451,7 @@ http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/index.htm
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>15.0</nbr>
<nbr>14.0</nbr>
<subject>&lt;nettime&gt; Bifo on Luther Blissett's *Q*</subject>
<from>Luther Blissett</from>
<to>nettime-l@bbs.thing.net</to>
@ -2622,7 +2622,7 @@ Project. Of course, everybody will still be free to adopt the name.
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>16.0</nbr>
<nbr>15.0</nbr>
<subject>&lt;nettime&gt; Who the fuck is Luther Blissett?</subject>
<from>Luther Blissett</from>
<to>nettime-l@bbs.thing.net</to>
@ -2758,138 +2758,7 @@ motive.' (Koji Wakamatsu)
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>17.0</nbr>
<subject>&lt;nettime&gt; open_source_hell.com</subject>
<from>Luther Blissett</from>
<to>nettime-l@desk.nl</to>
<date>Fri, 14 May 1999 02:42:42 +0200</date>
<content>
open_source_hell.com
www. HELL.COM was born in 1995 as a conceptual art piece, an anti-web
that sold and promoted nothing and was not accessible to the public: a
sheer b(l)ack hole of the web. For almost three years,
HELL.COM, a site with no content, never listed in any directory nor
linked anywhere, averages of a million hits per month from people typing
the name in search engines. It becomes therefore a conteiner for net.art
sites and art galleries in which is possible to get in only if you are
invited and whom list of member s is kept secret; it's what themselves
call "a private parallel web." The idea behind HELL.COM is to create a
launching pad for cyber-artists extremly elitist and with badly hidden
venal ambitions... a fuckin' museum!
During february 1999 HELL.COM organized "surface": a show with several
superstar net artists like zuper!, absurd, fakeshop and many more.
Like all the events by HELL.COM also this one was not available to the
public, but was opened exclusively to RHIZOME subscribers.
During the 48 hours opening 0100101110101101.ORG downloaded all the
files of the site; the clone has been put on line, this time
anticopyright,visible, reproducible and freely diffusible and, thanks to
some technical devices, even more easily downloadable.
According to 0100101110101101.ORG "the convinction that information must
be free is a tribute to the way in which a very good computer or a
valid program work: binary numbers move in accordance with the most
logic, direct and necessary way to do their complex function. What is a
computer if not somthing that benefit by the free flow of information? "
At the moment the site is on line at the url:
http://www.0100101110101101.ORG/hell.com
The situation is constantly changing and nobody knows if and how long
the site will remain active; actually HELL.COM has already threatened
legal proceedings for copyright violations.
open_source_hell.com: http://www.0100101110101101.ORG/hell.com
HELL.COM: http://www.hell.com
_____________________________________________________________________
Subject: [7-11] [fwd] WARNING1.0|||COPYRIGHT VIOLATION
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 21:14:37 +0200
From: 011101001010110100101111100001001000110101 {AT} 0100101110101101.ORG
Reply-To: 7-11 {AT} mila.ljudmila.org
To: 011101001010110100101111100001001000110101 {AT} 0100101110101101.ORG
Subject: WARNING1.0|||COPYRIGHT VIOLATION
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 21:42:33 -0700
From: JUSTICE {AT} HELL.com
re:
open_source_hell.com http://www.0100101110101101.ORG/hell.com
cute...
please immediately remove this material from your server
you are in violation of international copyright laws which are clearly
posted in the copyright information contained in our source code.
also of note,
it appears as though you have violated the copyrights of quite a few
of our members individually:::::::::::::::
http://www.0100101110101101.ORG
on behalf of these individuals we request that you also remove
these materials from your server as well
||||
it would make sense to use your "abilities"
to attempt something *original*
JUSTICE {AT} HELL.COM
Security\\\\
http://HELL.COM
|||||||||||
---
# distributed via nettime-l : no commercial use without permission
# &lt;nettime&gt; is a closed moderated mailinglist for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: majordomo {AT} desk.nl and "info nettime-l" in the msg body
# URL: http://www.desk.nl/~nettime/ contact: nettime-owner {AT} desk.nl
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>18.0</nbr>
<nbr>16.0</nbr>
<subject>&lt;nettime&gt; Down with war criminals</subject>
<from>Luther Blissett</from>
<to>nettime-l@desk.nl</to>
@ -2974,7 +2843,7 @@ April 1st, 1999
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>19.0</nbr>
<nbr>17.0</nbr>
<subject>&lt;nettime&gt; The downed Stealth and other Serbian pranks</subject>
<from>Luther Blissett</from>
<to>nettime-l@desk.nl</to>
@ -3079,7 +2948,7 @@ always be a filthy mind-fucker.
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>20.0</nbr>
<nbr>19.0</nbr>
<subject>&lt;nettime&gt; Franco Berardi Bifo: Europe, the stillborn ideal</subject>
<from>Luther Blissett</from>
<to>nettime-l@desk.nl</to>
@ -3382,7 +3251,7 @@ http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/index.htm
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>21.0</nbr>
<nbr>20.0</nbr>
<subject>&lt;nettime&gt; Luther Blissett Update # 3</subject>
<from>Luther Blissett</from>
<to>nettime-l@desk.nl</to>
@ -3579,7 +3448,7 @@ F.P. Belletati, Bologna, Italy
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>22.0</nbr>
<nbr>21.0</nbr>
<subject>&lt;nettime&gt; The London Times on Q</subject>
<from>Luther Blissett</from>
<to>nettime-l@desk.nl</to>
@ -3667,7 +3536,7 @@ F.P. Belletati, Bologna, Italy
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>23.0</nbr>
<nbr>22.0</nbr>
<subject>&lt;nettime&gt; Luther Blissett Update #4-a</subject>
<from>Luther Blissett</from>
<to>nettime-l@desk.nl</to>
@ -3886,7 +3755,7 @@ F.P. Belletati, Bologna, Italy
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>24.0</nbr>
<nbr>23.0</nbr>
<subject>&lt;nettime&gt; Luther Blissett to be rehabilitated</subject>
<from>Luther Blissett</from>
<to>nettime-l@desk.nl</to>
@ -4001,7 +3870,7 @@ F.P. Belletati, Bologna, Italy
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>25.0</nbr>
<nbr>24.0</nbr>
<subject>&lt;nettime&gt; Kosovo, Iron Lungs And Hard Cocks</subject>
<from>Luther Blissett</from>
<to>nettime-l@desk.nl</to>
@ -4205,7 +4074,7 @@ Luther Blissett, Faenza, 29 March 1999
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>26.0</nbr>
<nbr>25.0</nbr>
<subject>&lt;nettime&gt; Luther Blissett Update #2</subject>
<from>Luther Blissett</from>
<to>nettime-l@desk.nl</to>
@ -4432,7 +4301,7 @@ http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/index.htm
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>27.0</nbr>
<nbr>26.0</nbr>
<subject>&lt;nettime&gt; NETSTRIKE FOR CPA FI-SUD</subject>
<from>Luther Blissett</from>
<to>nettime-l@desk.nl</to>
@ -4529,7 +4398,7 @@ http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Hangar/2558/aids.html (italiano)
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>28.0</nbr>
<nbr>27.0</nbr>
<subject>&lt;nettime&gt; Stop censorship: PIE on lin</subject>
<from>Luther Blissett</from>
<to>nettime-l@desk.nl</to>
@ -4640,7 +4509,7 @@ Numero 2 in uscita a novembre.
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>29.0</nbr>
<nbr>28.0</nbr>
<subject>&lt;nettime&gt; on moderation and spams</subject>
<from>Luther Blissett</from>
<to>nettime-l@desk.nl</to>
@ -4703,7 +4572,7 @@ New documents and pics on the ramps!
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>29.1</nbr>
<nbr>28.1</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; on moderation and spams</subject>
<from>cisler</from>
<to>nettime-l@desk.nl</to>
@ -4728,7 +4597,7 @@ Steve Cisler
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>29.2</nbr>
<nbr>28.2</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; on moderation and spams</subject>
<from>Stefan Wray</from>
<to>nettime-l@desk.nl</to>
@ -4782,7 +4651,7 @@ automatically take people's addresses off the new list?
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>29.3</nbr>
<nbr>28.3</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; on moderation and spams</subject>
<from>David S. Bennahum</from>
<to>nettime-l@desk.nl</to>
@ -4821,7 +4690,7 @@ it gratefully, for a list without law is a list of nettime.assholes.
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>30.0</nbr>
<nbr>29.0</nbr>
<subject>&lt;nettime&gt; The exposure of Mussolini's corps</subject>
<from>Luther Blissett</from>
<to>nettime-l@desk.nl</to>
@ -4902,7 +4771,7 @@ http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Rampart/6812
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>31.0</nbr>
<nbr>30.0</nbr>
<subject>&lt;nettime&gt; Songs From The Wood</subject>
<from>Luther Blissett</from>
<to>nettime-l@desk.nl</to>
@ -5194,7 +5063,7 @@ September 1998
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>32.0</nbr>
<nbr>31.0</nbr>
<subject>&lt;nettime&gt; New Interactive Communication and 'Antagonismo' in Italy</subject>
<from>t.tozzi {AT} ecn.org</from>
<to>nettime-l@desk.nl</to>
@ -5867,7 +5736,7 @@ defence of cyber-rights taking place in Florence in June 1998.
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>32.1</nbr>
<nbr>31.1</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; New Interactive Communication and 'Antagonismo' in Italy</subject>
<from>Luther Blissett</from>
<to>nettime-l@desk.nl</to>
@ -5894,7 +5763,7 @@ http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Rampart/6812
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>33.0</nbr>
<nbr>32.0</nbr>
<subject>&lt;nettime&gt; Blue Telephone vs. Luther Blissett ?!</subject>
<from>Luther Blissett</from>
<to>nettime-l@desk.nl</to>
@ -6023,7 +5892,7 @@ That's all.
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>34.0</nbr>
<nbr>33.0</nbr>
<subject>&lt;nettime&gt; Italian netizens are in danger</subject>
<from>Luther Blissett</from>
<to>nettime-l@desk.nl</to>
@ -6218,7 +6087,7 @@ gris {AT} bo.nettuno.it
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>35.0</nbr>
<nbr>34.0</nbr>
<subject>&lt;nettime&gt; Negri, Bordiga, the general intellect and the nomadic war machines</subject>
<from>Luther Blissett</from>
<to>nettime-l@desk.nl</to>
@ -6392,7 +6261,7 @@ P.S. Did you think I was just a media prankster? &gt;;-))))))
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>36.0</nbr>
<nbr>35.0</nbr>
<subject>&lt;nettime&gt; Negri &amp; Guattari</subject>
<from>Luther Blissett</from>
<to>nettime-l@desk.nl</to>
@ -6456,7 +6325,7 @@ saluther.
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>37.0</nbr>
<nbr>36.0</nbr>
<subject>Syndicate: [net.INSTITUTE.it] Call for partecipations and contributions</subject>
<from>Luther Blissett Project</from>
<to>n/a</to>

1039
xml/16.NN.xml
View File

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff

2584
xml/4.net.art.xml
View File

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff

444
xml/5.Netzkritik.xml
View File

@ -809,286 +809,6 @@ werden sollen, nach denen man Projekte beurteilen kann.
Daraufhin bitten die Veranstalter Tilmann Baumgaertel ueber
aktuelle Vorgaenge bei Compuserve zu berichten.]
/Tilmann Baumgaertel/
Bei Compuserve gibt es eigentlich kein Forum, wo die Nutzer
in irgendeiner Form auf das Unternehmen einwirken koennen,
Fragen stellen koennen. Deswegen hat sich
interessanterweise in den letzten Monaten das Hilfeforum
veraendert, das eigentlich so ein Support-Forum ist, wo man
technische Fragen stellen kann, zum Beispiel wie kriege ich
meine User-ID, wie kann ich mein Passwort aendern und so
weiter. Da ist in den letzten Monaten eine Diskussion
aufgekommen, die recht grundsaetzliche Fragen stellt, wie
beispielsweise: In welcher Form muessen Sysops ihre</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>2.1</nbr>
<subject>ZKP - interfiction</subject>
<from>Herbert A. Meyer</from>
<to>nettime-l@desk.nl</to>
<date>Thu, 11 Jan 1996 00:45:45 +0100 (MEZ)</date>
<content>ZK Proceedings 1995
&gt;net criticism&lt;
**Essays/Statements
_ .-. .--. _ .-. _
:_; .' `. : .-':_; .' `.:_;
.-.,-.,-.`. .'.--. .--. : `; .-. .--.`. .'.-. .--. ,-.,-.
: :: ,. : : :' '_.': ..': : : :' ..': : : :' .; :: ,. :
:_;:_;:_; :_;`.__.':_; :_; :_;`.__.':_; :_;`.__.':_;:_;
ASCII-documentation pt I
-----------------------------------------------------------
pre 0.1
-----------------------------------------------------------
TRANSLATED MESSAGE:
*Preface: interfiction - perspectives and myths of counter-
public in data-nets
The global data-network is on everyone's lips. Initiatives
that plan and promote the further extension of the nets in
the big style originate in politics and economy. Goal of
this engangement is an efficiency-oriented and economy-
centered utilization of the new structures of
communication. The capacity of these projects is already
proven within a wide range of areas and especially curious
people are working with it yet. However, one can also judge
this development skeptically. Traveling on the data-highway
and the visit of virtual department stores doesn't differ
from the everyday purchase and from newspaper-reading
particularly. interfiction lays attention on the question
how these multi-functional communication-structures can be
used in an innovative and unconventional type and manner.
interfiction would like to introduce these new
possibilities from another perspective and sets the main
focus on the discussion about counter-public net-
utilization.
Counter-public has turned itself into the myth. The
idea that a critical contact with media leads inevitably to
a transformation of the society is obsolete. However, the
data-nets offer a new occasion to use this myth
constructively. Net-projects try, fascinated of the
potentials of the net, to update the mythical dimensions of
the electronic structure. Globalization, democratization
and free access to information are catchwords. So it is
possible within the Internet, for example, to ensure direct
access to the entire data-material. As long as 'in real
world' the distribution of the calculators is limited the
Internet is truly not a global net. The catchword
democratization has to be considered skeptically as well.
It becomes more and more evident that the new technologies
simply entwine itself around the old structures. So there
is a new myth of 'counter-public' with an inherent
ambivalent character. The world doesn't turn into a global
village automatically, just as the data-networks do not
inevitable render to a democratization.
Nevertheless the discussion about the net-myths could
engage a critical reflection on the use of data-networks.
The projects who were invited to the interfiction-workshops
try to enable communication and interaction on net-adequate
and innovative type and manner, what means in contrast to
pure efficiency-oriented projects. This is exactly the
topic, that interfiction wanted to process. The two-day
workshop took place at Dec the 8th and 9th 1995 to enable a
detailed and intensive discussion. Following you will find
the transcription of the beginning of the second workshop.
sorry, only in German :-(
-----------------------------------------------------------
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
*Einleitung: interfiction - Perspektiven und Mythen von
Gegenoeffentlichkeit in Datennetzen
Die globale Datenvernetzung ist in aller Munde. In Politik
und Wirtschaft entstehen Initiativen, die den weiteren
Ausbau der Netze im groszen Stil planen und foerdern. Ziel
dieses Engangements ist eine effizienzorientierte und
wirtschaftzentrierte Nutzung der neuen
Kommunikationsstrukturen. Diese Projekte sind in vielen
Bereichen bereits funktionsfaehig und werden von einem
besonders neugierigen Teil der Bevoelkerung auch schon
benutzt. Man kann diese Entwicklung jedoch auch skeptisch
beurteilen. Das Reisen auf der Datenautobahn und der Besuch
von virtuellen Warenhaeusern unterscheidet sich naemlich
nicht sonderlich vom alltaeglichen Einkauf und vom
Zeitungslesen. interfiction stellt sich nun die Frage, wie
diese multifunktionalen Kommunikationsstrukturen auf eine
innovative und unkonventionelle Art und Weise benutzt
werden koennen. interfiction moechte diese neuen
Moeglichkeiten aus einer anderen Perspektive vorstellen und
den Schwerpunkt auf die Diskussion einer
'gegenoeffentlichen' Netznutzung legen.
Gegenoeffentlichkeit ist selber zum Mythos geworden.
Die Vorstellung, dasz ein kritischer Umgang mit Medien
zwangslaeufig zu einer Umgestaltung der Gesellschaft
fuehrt, ist veraltet. Die Datennetze bieten jedoch eine
neuen Anlasz, diesen Mythos konstruktiv zu verwenden.
Netzprojekte versuchen, fasziniert durch die Potentiale des
Netzes, die mythischen Dimensionen der elektronischen
Struktur zu aktualisieren. Schlagworte dazu sind
Globalisierung, Demokratisierung und freier Zugang zu
Informationen. So ist es innerhalb des Internets
beispielsweise moeglich, unmittelbar auf das gesamte
Datenmaterial zuzugreifen. Da in der 'realen' Welt jedoch
keine globale Verbreitung von Rechnern gegeben ist, ist das
Internet kein wirklich globales Netz. Das Schlagwort
Demokratisierung ist aehnlich skeptisch zu betrachten.
Immer wahrscheinlicher wird es, dasz die neuen
Kommunikationstechnologien einfach um die alten Strukturen
ranken, diesen zwar partiell neue Moeglichkeiten schaffen,
wobei deren Organisation aber unbeschadet bestehen bleibt.
Es gibt also einen neuen 'Mythos Gegenoeffentlichkeit' in
Datennetzen, der einen grundlegend ambivalenten Charakter
hat. Die Welt wird keineswegs automatisch zu einem globalen
Dorf. Genausowenig wird die Datenvernetzung zu einer
automatischen Demokratisierung fuehren.
Die netzspezifischen Mythen werden aber fuer die von
uns eingeladenen Netzprojekte zu einem Anhaltspunkt, wenn
es um konkrete Umgangsweisen und Strategien in Datennetzen
geht. Im Gegensatz zu einer rein effizienzorientierten
Anwendung versuchen diese Projekte auf netzadaequate und
innovative Art und Weise Kommunikation und Interaktion zu
ermoeglichen. Dieses ist genau das Thema, das interfiction
bearbeiten will. interfiction moechte ein moeglichst
breites Spektrum von Initiativen vorstellen, die in den
Bereichen Kunst/Kultur, Stadt, Universitaet und
Journalistik arbeiten, und sowohl Internet/WWW als auch
Mailbox-Systeme benutzen.
Im Zentrum von interfiction stand ein zweitaegiges
Seminar. Es fand am 8.12 und am 9.12. jeweils von 13.00 bis
17.00 Uhr statt. Durch die Seminarform sollte eine
ausfuehrliche und intensive Auseinandersetzung ermoeglicht
werden. Im folgenden nun eine Transkribierung des Beginns
vom zweiten interfiction-Seminar.
-----------------------------------------------------------
*Transkribierung des Beginns von Seminar 2 - Kassel, 9.12.1995
Legende
/ / = SprecherIn
_ _ = Betonung
(...) = Auslassung
[ ] = Anmerkung
(-&gt; ) = Referenz
[Das Seminar wird durch die Veranstalter von Uwe Hermanns,
Herbert A Meyer und Gerhard Wissner eroeffnet (-&gt;URL_1). Es
wird auf eine Tischvorlage hingewiesen, die 18 ethische
Prinzipien beinhaltet (-&gt;URL_1). Diese wurden von Tommaso
Tozzi (Strano Network, Italien) anlaesslich des Budapester
Treffens Metaforum II verfasst (-&gt;URL_2). Zu Beginn wird
Volker Grassmuck von den Veranstaltern darum gebeten, sein
aktuelles Projekt Access for All-FAQ (-&gt;URL_3)
vorzustellen.]
/Volker Grassmuck/
Zum Rahmen des Projekts: Ich wuerde mir das wuenschen als
einen Beitrag fuer die Internet World Expo (-&gt;URL_4) im
naechsten Jahr, die von Carl Malamud und Vinton Cerf
organisiert wird. Ich gehe davon aus, wenn ich mich in dem
nicht voellig taeusche, dass es einen Internet-Hype geben
wird im naechsten Jahr, der alles in den Schatten stellt,
was wir bislang gesehen haben. Die Expo geht nach dem
Modell der Weltausstellungen des 19. Jahrhunderts. Es ist
also eine industrielle Leistungsschau. Nicht nur - also da
sind auch durchaus sozial engagierte Projekte vertreten,
aber vor allen Dingen geht es um Technologie, wenn ich das
richtig verstehe. Im Rahmen der Expo wuerde ich mir das
angestrebte Projekt sehr gut vorstellen koennen. Ich
moechte diese access-for-all-Modelle, also Netzwerk-
Entwicklung von unten, auch international praesentieren und
eine grosse Oeffentlichkeit dafuer gewinnen. Und dazu
sollte es folgendes geben: Zunaechst einmal einen access-
for-all-File, also einen ersten Entwurf fuer einen
theoretischen, politischen Argumentationsstrang: Warum
access for all? Dann soll es eine Zusammenstellung von
verschiedenen Projekten geben, die man unter dieses Dach
fassen kann. Es geht nicht um eine neue Organisation oder
sowas, sondern um die gesammelte Praesentation von
Projekten, die zeigen, dass wir nicht auf die Telekom,
nicht auf Burda und nicht auf Berlesconi und sonstjemanden
angewiesen sind. Es geht darum, dass wir Netze selber
machen koennen. Ein besonderer Schwerpunkt liegt im
Hinblick auf die Gebuehrenerhoehung ab dem 1. Januar auf
alternative Loesungen fuer den Local Loop, also fuer den
letzten Kilometer bis zur Wohnung. Prenzlnet (-&gt;URL_5),
gestern schon mehrfach angesprochen, soll ein Art Workshop-
Charakter haben, wo die verschiedensten Loesungen von
Lasern bis zum Babyphon und Packet-Radio und so weiter
ausprobiert werden. Und am Schluss soll dabei eine Liste
von Starterkits herauskommen, die Projekte irgendwo auf dem
Land... also Leute, die vielleicht auch nicht in solchen
Zusammenhaengen sind, aber trotzdem das an ihrem Ort machen
wollen, beigehen koennen und sich sehr konkrete
Informationen holen. Bis hin zu Bestellinformationen - wo
kriegt man irgendwelche Lasertechnologie moeglichst billig
zum Beispiel. Aber auch ueber Organisationsmodelle,
Finanzierungsmodelle und so weiter muss man natuerlich
nachdenken. Ebenso ueber Software, die bestimmte Gruppen
entwickelt haben und die sie bereit sind, mit anderen zu
teilen. Die Gemeinschaften, die da jeweils entstanden sind,
sollten beschrieben werden. Das Ganze soll dann auf der
Next 5 Minutes-Konferenz (-&gt;URL_6) praesentiert werden. Bis
dahin ist das Projekt natuerlich noch nicht fertig. Es wird
aber auch nie fertig werden, sondern es soll nur der erste
Kristallisationskern sein, der eine moeglichst grosse
Bandbreite von organisatorischen und technischen Modellen
vorstellt. Zum Beispiel die Digitale Stad (-&gt;URL_7), die
Internationale Stadt (-&gt;URL_8), das Zamir-Net in Ex-
Jugoslawien (-&gt;URL_9), Bulletin-Board-Systeme (-&gt;URL_10)
und so weiter. Und im Laufe des naechsten Jahres, die Expo
laeuft das ganze Jahr 1996, kann das dann Werkstatt-
Charakter bekommen, auch die Website. Ueber diesen FAQ-File
soll nach Moeglichkeit die Diskussion weiterlaufen und es
sollen weitere Projekte angeregt werden, die dann im Laufe
des naechsten Jahres entstehen und damit aufgenommen
werden.
[Zwischenfragen zur Expo, mit der Bitte, diese genauer zu
eroertern.]
/Volker Grassmuck/
Also Industrieschau ist auch ein bisschen zynisch
formuliert. Ganz so schlimm ist es nicht. Ist Carl Malamud
ein Begriff? Der hat angefangen mit Internet-Talk-Radio,
also erstmals Broadcast im Internet, dann freie Programme,
Interviews mit irgendwelchen Internet-Figuren, so
technische Sachen. Er ist halt ein Hacker, Techno-Hacker.
Dann hat er ein Buch ueber ueber Internet-Traveller
geschrieben, war in Japan, Thailand, Schweiz. Ein sehr
aktiver Mensch aus der Techno-Szene. Industrie ist insofern
nicht ganz richtig. Aber die Veranstalter der Expo haben
Kanaele zu den ganz Grossen. Es wird eine T3-Backbone-
Leitung entstehen von San Francisco nach Washington, nach
Amsterdam und nach Tokio. Das Stueck innerhalb der USA und
nach Japan scheint schon zu stehen. Das wird von MCI bereit
gestellt, das sind keine Hacker mehr. Aber so eine
Backbone-Leitung zu legen ist auch fuer Hacker nicht so
ganz einfach. Und ansonsten ist die Internet-Expo total
offen. Im Prinzip kann jeder dort Pavillons anmelden und
events machen. Zusaetzlich soll es auch darum gehen,
ausserhalb der Netze Zugangspunkte bereit zu stellen. Und
dieses ist auch als Problem erkannt worden. Und da spielt
durchaus auch access-for-all, also oeffentliche, kostenlos
benutzbare Terminals, als Idee eine Rolle. Der Rahmen ist
mir eigentlich nur wichtig, weil er fuer Oeffentlichkeit
sorgen wird. Es ist ganz merkwuerdig, in Deutschland ist
die Expo ueberhaupt kein Thema. In Japan, in Thailand, in
den USA ist sie das Thema ueberhaupt. Alle Leute, die
irgendwas mit dem Internet zu tun haben, sind wie wahnsinng
dabei, Pavillions fuers naechste Jahr zu bauen.
[Zwischenfragen. Es wird geklaert, dass die Expo-Pavillions
virtuelle Pavillions, also Websites sind. Volker Grassmuck
weist noch darauf hin, dass im Rahmen seines Projektes
inhaltliche Kriterien, Unterscheidungskriterien entwickelt
werden sollen, nach denen man Projekte beurteilen kann.
Daraufhin bitten die Veranstalter Tilmann Baumgaertel ueber
aktuelle Vorgaenge bei Compuserve zu berichten.]
/Tilmann Baumgaertel/
Bei Compuserve gibt es eigentlich kein Forum, wo die Nutzer
in irgendeiner Form auf das Unternehmen einwirken koennen,
@ -1587,7 +1307,7 @@ it to the bestsellers-list.
So: d'accord with the general problem Geert presents, but with the
reservation that coining another term (like the virtual intellectual)
does not lead the way out of this logic of decline fostered by so many
traditional intellectuals. Wasn't it Vilém Flusser who, for the
traditional intellectuals. Wasn't it Vil&#233;m Flusser who, for the
intellectual of the future, imagined a conceptual suicide of sorts, as
the disintegration of objects and their subjects already became an
everday experience against which our culture holds up so many fictitious
@ -2106,9 +1826,9 @@ overlooked on important detail, that makes this whole story even more
questionable: that Wired magazin itself is in the business of
internet-based push media.
I´m not talking about the slightly obnoxious attempts of certain
I&#180;m not talking about the slightly obnoxious attempts of certain
Wired-editors to make Nettimers participate in Chats with their
cyber-buddys (the ones that eventually don´t take place, haha). I´m talking
cyber-buddys (the ones that eventually don&#180;t take place, haha). I&#180;m talking
about the News-Service that Wired offers in collaboration with "Pointcast",
the pioneers of "push media".
@ -2117,7 +1837,7 @@ also delievered to "the comfort of your own home" via one of the "channels"
of Pointcast, a programm that downloads stuff to your computer when you are
not using your internet connection, and displays it as a screen saver. You
have to subscribe to this service like you would subscribe to a magazine. I
do not use "Pointcast" myself, but that´s what I learned from various
do not use "Pointcast" myself, but that&#180;s what I learned from various
reports in the internet press.
That would make this cover story a bold attempt of "hard sell":
@ -2136,6 +1856,84 @@ PS: If you want to see grown men or women cry, make them install the
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>10.0</nbr>
<subject>Re: nettime: push wired?</subject>
<from>mercedes</from>
<to>nettime-l@desk.nl</to>
<date>Thu, 13 Mar 1997 21:16:28 +0100 (MET)</date>
<content>Dear Geert,
&gt;I do not agree with Foucault about the status of critique. He
&gt;might be right, but the effects of his phrases about the End of
&gt;Critique have prevented many of our generation in making rough,
&gt;dirty, daily analyses of the powers-to-be (and making mistakes).
I do partly agree with what you wrote here. But isn^t it like this: More
than Foucault stopped any critique he got caught from right positions, who
tried to hold his writings against the left thinking like: Here, look, your
fight is over! It is over in a different sense for me, because i think we
have to go over to new strategies, which does not mean stop analyses, but
work further on it and hold an own modell against it. Like nettime maybe
normally is. In fact Foucault never told anywhere anybody to stop thinking,
but he created new modells in showing that critique has always to change to
be still critique.
&gt;I need mirrors, fixed
&gt;objects, texts I can analyze, in order to better understand the
&gt;rapid developments.
Of course there are still these traditional tools of analyses, but they
changed the direction, didn^t they? It is not about criticizing anything
and that^s it, but about using it as a mirror, like you said, in order to
devellop own strategies.
I did get very radical about this, which means in detail: I do not care
about the mistakes of the "other", but prefer to take up all the evil (gee,
my words), annoying things and learn from them. Take the good things away
from them, steal them over to my own concepts. (That^s what YT in Snowcrash
does, kind of) Putting up a border between us in terms of where are their
mistakes equals why are they bad would prevent me from learning.
I personally criticize in that negative way when i do not understand what
and why something is going on. Like as time to think.
&gt;Wired is not an endangered species or some minority that cannot
&gt;defend itself so easily.
I never thought Wired as a victim, nor did i want to defend them, just to
hold open this possibility to look at them and take their knowledge and
tricks away. To much negative critique can just close that door, i think.
&gt;But Wired is small, Ken Wark is right about that. Even the whole
&gt;media business is nothing compared to other industries. But it's
&gt;our branch. And Wired is my magazine. I haven't missed one issue
&gt;and I am the last one to look down on it, or dismiss it because
&gt;of it's bad quality. Both Mondo 2000 and Mediamatic almost seized
&gt;to exist (as regular publications). And we have not been able yet
&gt;to come up with a critical alternative to Wired. That's why they
&gt;have the field to themselves, still.
There may be the point really. As Mark Stahlmann wrote:
&gt;The answer to your question is that we don't know the answer. The
&gt;Toffler/Kelly world has been working on their view of post-industrialism
&gt;for 40+ years. The post-modernist philosophers have also been building
&gt;their houses for just as long (or longer depending on when you start
&gt;counting).
The reason, why Wired is so big, might be quite obvious. Clever combination
of new and more important than ever technology wrapped up in a little bit
of culture, spiced and mildered by a little bit of journalistic approach to
get it smooth. And the right time, where people want to know these things.
Wonder if we not better start an analyses on the package of information.
Style of writing is the context of information, in the net as well as here
in our magazine. (i am working for a musicmagazine called Soundlab -
electronic aspects of life -&gt; http://www.techno.de/soundlab).
As soon as we get more pages, we want to integrate net..., yeah, what,
...culture, this word again?. Don^t know yet.
Have fun, cu perhaps somtimes, if you stopp by in Berlin, would be nice.
Mercedes Bunz</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>10.1</nbr>
<subject>nettime: push wired?</subject>
<from>Geert Lovink</from>
<to>nettime-l@desk.nl</to>
@ -2227,84 +2025,6 @@ have the field to themselves, still.
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>10.1</nbr>
<subject>Re: nettime: push wired?</subject>
<from>mercedes</from>
<to>nettime-l@desk.nl</to>
<date>Thu, 13 Mar 1997 21:16:28 +0100 (MET)</date>
<content>Dear Geert,
&gt;I do not agree with Foucault about the status of critique. He
&gt;might be right, but the effects of his phrases about the End of
&gt;Critique have prevented many of our generation in making rough,
&gt;dirty, daily analyses of the powers-to-be (and making mistakes).
I do partly agree with what you wrote here. But isn^t it like this: More
than Foucault stopped any critique he got caught from right positions, who
tried to hold his writings against the left thinking like: Here, look, your
fight is over! It is over in a different sense for me, because i think we
have to go over to new strategies, which does not mean stop analyses, but
work further on it and hold an own modell against it. Like nettime maybe
normally is. In fact Foucault never told anywhere anybody to stop thinking,
but he created new modells in showing that critique has always to change to
be still critique.
&gt;I need mirrors, fixed
&gt;objects, texts I can analyze, in order to better understand the
&gt;rapid developments.
Of course there are still these traditional tools of analyses, but they
changed the direction, didn^t they? It is not about criticizing anything
and that^s it, but about using it as a mirror, like you said, in order to
devellop own strategies.
I did get very radical about this, which means in detail: I do not care
about the mistakes of the "other", but prefer to take up all the evil (gee,
my words), annoying things and learn from them. Take the good things away
from them, steal them over to my own concepts. (That^s what YT in Snowcrash
does, kind of) Putting up a border between us in terms of where are their
mistakes equals why are they bad would prevent me from learning.
I personally criticize in that negative way when i do not understand what
and why something is going on. Like as time to think.
&gt;Wired is not an endangered species or some minority that cannot
&gt;defend itself so easily.
I never thought Wired as a victim, nor did i want to defend them, just to
hold open this possibility to look at them and take their knowledge and
tricks away. To much negative critique can just close that door, i think.
&gt;But Wired is small, Ken Wark is right about that. Even the whole
&gt;media business is nothing compared to other industries. But it's
&gt;our branch. And Wired is my magazine. I haven't missed one issue
&gt;and I am the last one to look down on it, or dismiss it because
&gt;of it's bad quality. Both Mondo 2000 and Mediamatic almost seized
&gt;to exist (as regular publications). And we have not been able yet
&gt;to come up with a critical alternative to Wired. That's why they
&gt;have the field to themselves, still.
There may be the point really. As Mark Stahlmann wrote:
&gt;The answer to your question is that we don't know the answer. The
&gt;Toffler/Kelly world has been working on their view of post-industrialism
&gt;for 40+ years. The post-modernist philosophers have also been building
&gt;their houses for just as long (or longer depending on when you start
&gt;counting).
The reason, why Wired is so big, might be quite obvious. Clever combination
of new and more important than ever technology wrapped up in a little bit
of culture, spiced and mildered by a little bit of journalistic approach to
get it smooth. And the right time, where people want to know these things.
Wonder if we not better start an analyses on the package of information.
Style of writing is the context of information, in the net as well as here
in our magazine. (i am working for a musicmagazine called Soundlab -
electronic aspects of life -&gt; http://www.techno.de/soundlab).
As soon as we get more pages, we want to integrate net..., yeah, what,
...culture, this word again?. Don^t know yet.
Have fun, cu perhaps somtimes, if you stopp by in Berlin, would be nice.
Mercedes Bunz</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>11.0</nbr>
<subject>nettime: submission to nettime lis</subject>
<from>Bruce Sterling</from>

120
xml/6.FLOSS.xml
View File

@ -4212,5 +4212,125 @@ Now, for free my gang offers surefire immortality and depthless
wisdom, PayPal us $100 for the top secret URL at golden-egg.
domain. Don't believe anything else, motley fool.</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>11.0</nbr>
<subject>&lt;nettime&gt; Open letter to the Free Software Movement</subject>
<from>Jaromil</from>
<to>nettime-l@kein.org</to>
<date>Thu, 26 Sep 2019 17:02:33 +0200</date>
<content>This is an open letter to all the people who, in their good faith, are
concerned about the recent events which have shaken the long-standing
leadership of the Free Software Movement and the GNU project.
Online:
https://www.dyne.org/open-letter-to-the-free-software-movement/
RT: https://twitter.com/DyneOrg/status/1177233578771591168
Context:
https://www.wired.com/story/richard-stallmans-exit-heralds-a-new-era-in-tech/
Dear hackers, first and foremost let us say that, as a collective and
in the true uncompromising spirit of the teachings of Free/Libre
Software/Society, we are capable of doing much better than what has
just happened.
Many of us work everyday towards ensuring that everyone, regardless of
their ethniticy, religion, gender, or neurotypicality, can
participate, learn and share in our communities. We do not claim we
are perfect, we sometimes make mistakes, some of them guided by
systemic patterns and structures of power still entangling us, and
some of them just due to our human nature . But we claim our right to
learn every day how to become better at including all contributions
and opinions, and this implies the ability of making mistakes without
being destroyed by them.
In the past years it has become clear that our movement and our ethos
has transformed the world as we know it, with all the courage and all
the mistakes considered; some of us rose to fame, while some others
wore masks, both as a message and as a protection from the regime of
global espionage. In any case, many of us have sacrificed a great
deal of comfort in life to change what needed to be changed.
Let us not be mistaken about the cause that brought us here and let us
not forget where the injustice comes from.
Let us not forget then what we, the people, have successfully built so
far, resisting to the incredible pressure that corporate corruption
and military regimes have put on us. Let us not forget that the battle
is still raging and we are losing sight and positioning.
Open Source, as an economic model based on knowledge acquisition by
corporate powers, is part of the problem.
Free/Libre Software, as an uncompromising philosophy and ethics
focused on knowledge sharing and participation, is an important part
of the solution.
The era of benevolent dictators for life in Free software projects is
probably coming to an end. And we shall be relieved as well as
empowered by that: it is now our turn to stand strong, united as a
movement, to defend our values without compromise and to improve the
quality of our interactions. It is now our turn to look beyond
personal responsibilities, to acknowledge that if a context is
poisoned by bullying, machism and sexist behavior, it is not just the
fault of a single person, but of all those who tolerate and support
those conducts. We have now the opportunity to point to the problem
and to solve it and this will improve our movement, the Free Software
movement.
What we really don't need to do is to ignore, denigrate or disown the
values of the Free Software movement.
We need to honour the pride of the people of India who had the courage
to stand up against the "free basic" campaign. We need to support the
courage of all those defending network neutrality from attacks capable
of putting under control the political integrity of entire continents.
We need to facilitate the synergy between community networks in Oaxaca
enabled by software written by activists all around the World. We
need to empower the self-determination of entire populations in an age
in which computing is as pervasive as our own social relationships.
We need to reclaim our freedom from an ever-watching system of control
and prediction that judges us from the algorithmic projection of our
own intentions. We need to defend our freedom to be able to denounce
all of this and speak freely by means that connect us, all over the
world, without borders, intermediaries and censorship.
We need to be conscious of where we are standing in this fight.
As a trans-national movement, united by solidarity, awareness and
ethics, we shall not negotiate the motivations we fight for.
We would not publish this letter if we would not think it was
extremely urgent to do so. The Free Software movement is losing
ground, grip and resources, and the scarce resources available to the
movement are not even shared equally. Global meetings that are vital
to our legacy and development are at risk of being shut down or
assimilated by corporate corruption: the Free Society Conference and
Nordic Summit (FSCONS) will not take place this year, after many
iterations that have hosted outstanding standards of diversity. The
biggest community-based event for free software developers in the
world, FOSDEM, is at risk of violating many of its foundational
principles by welcoming corporate sponsors, who contribute to the
dilution of meaning and ethical urgency of Free Software by supporting
corporate Openwashing campaigns.
And this is just a small account from Europe. We know that, wherever
you are in the world, if you have been in this movement, you are
probably struggling as well. Believe us now when we say that it will
not help to burn the Man, to obliterate the memory of our cause, to
expunge someone's contributions to it by means of an angry mob; that
would be an act of harassment we cannot be able to accept.
We will start improving as a movement when we show the highest notion
of what a movement can be: capable of reflection, understanding and
healing its wounds, ready to evolve and progress while maintaining the
integrity of its aims.
We are not the problem, we are part of the solution.
The Free World needs the Free Software movement.</content>
</mail>
</mails>
</chapter>

40
xml/7.Critique_Art_Politics.xml
View File

@ -613,7 +613,7 @@ representation in which the ghostly sovereign appears in a glass darkly.
&lt;...&gt;</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>0.15</nbr>
<nbr>0.8</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; 50 Ways To Leave Your Lover</subject>
<from>Eric Kluitenberg</from>
<to>nettime-l@kein.org</to>
@ -798,7 +798,7 @@ bests,
Eric</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>0.16</nbr>
<nbr>0.9</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; 50 Ways To Leave Your Lover</subject>
<from>Brian Holmes</from>
<to>nettime-l@kein.org</to>
@ -1043,7 +1043,7 @@ pretty hot in Paris but it only rains at night!
my best to all as well, Brian</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>0.16</nbr>
<nbr>0.10</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; 50 Ways To Leave Your Lover</subject>
<from>Michael Gurstein</from>
<to>nettime-l@kein.org</to>
@ -1835,7 +1835,7 @@ __________
M</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>1.4</nbr>
<nbr>1.7</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; Political Work in the Aftermath of the New Media Arts Crisis</subject>
<from>Renee Turner</from>
<to>nettime-l@kein.org</to>
@ -1941,7 +1941,7 @@ http://www.fudgethefacts.com/
http://www.geuzen.org/female_icons/</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>1.5</nbr>
<nbr>1.8</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; Political Work in the Aftermath of the New Media Arts Crisis</subject>
<from>Florian Cramer</from>
<to>nettime-l@kein.org</to>
@ -2106,7 +2106,7 @@ homepage: http://cramer.pleintekst.nl:70
gopher://cramer.pleintekst.nl</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>1.6</nbr>
<nbr>1.9</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; Political Work in the Aftermath of the New Media Arts Crisis</subject>
<from>Renee Turner</from>
<to>nettime-l@kein.org</to>
@ -2224,7 +2224,7 @@ http://www.geuzen.org/
http://www.fudgethefacts.com/</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>1.7</nbr>
<nbr>1.10</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; Political Work in the Aftermath of the New Media Arts Crisis</subject>
<from>carlos katastrofsky</from>
<to>nettime-l@kein.org</to>
@ -2269,7 +2269,7 @@ http://katastrofsky.cont3xt.net
http://cont3xt.net</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>1.8</nbr>
<nbr>1.11</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; Political Work in the Aftermath of the New Media Arts Crisis</subject>
<from>Rama Hoetzlein</from>
<to>nettime-l@kein.org</to>
@ -2318,7 +2318,7 @@ abused by culture.
-rama hoetzlein</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>1.9</nbr>
<nbr>1.12</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; Political Work in the Aftermath of the New Media Arts Crisis</subject>
<from>Brian Holmes</from>
<to>nettime-l@kein.org</to>
@ -2390,7 +2390,7 @@ ready for more. Let the thousand info-aesthetics bloom!
best, BH</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>1.10</nbr>
<nbr>1.13</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; Political Work in the Aftermath of the New Media Arts Crisis</subject>
<from>Rama Hoetzlein</from>
<to>nettime-l@kein.org</to>
@ -2460,7 +2460,7 @@ through individual communication.
-rama</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>1.11</nbr>
<nbr>1.14</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; Political Work in the Aftermath of the New Media Arts Crisis</subject>
<from>ben . craggs</from>
<to>nettime-l@kein.org</to>
@ -2524,7 +2524,7 @@ it's media).
Ben</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>1.12</nbr>
<nbr>1.15</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; Political Work in the Aftermath of the New Media Arts Crisis</subject>
<from>carlos katastrofsky</from>
<to>nettime-l@kein.org</to>
@ -2557,7 +2557,7 @@ http://katastrofsky.cont3xt.net
http://cont3xt.net</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>1.13</nbr>
<nbr>1.16</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; Political Work in the Aftermath of the New Media Arts Crisis</subject>
<from>Rama Hoetzlein</from>
<to>nettime-l@kein.org</to>
@ -2577,7 +2577,7 @@ theory only gets you so far as an artist.
rama</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>1.14</nbr>
<nbr>1.17</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; Political Work in the Aftermath of the New Media Arts Crisis</subject>
<from>Brian Holmes</from>
<to>nettime-l@kein.org</to>
@ -2763,7 +2763,7 @@ communication" of what already exists.
best, Brian</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>1.15</nbr>
<nbr>1.18</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; Political Work in the Aftermath of the New Media Arts Crisis</subject>
<from>Michael H Goldhaber</from>
<to>nettime-l@kein.org</to>
@ -2814,7 +2814,7 @@ Best,
Michael</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>1.16</nbr>
<nbr>1.19</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; Political Work in the Aftermath of the New Media Arts Crisis</subject>
<from>eyescratch</from>
<to>nettime-l@kein.org</to>
@ -2865,7 +2865,7 @@ towards the ideological.
hTTp://eyescratch.tk</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>1.19</nbr>
<nbr>1.20</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; Political Work in the Aftermath of the New Media Arts Crisis</subject>
<from>Florian Cramer</from>
<to>nettime-l@kein.org</to>
@ -2985,7 +2985,7 @@ homepage: http://cramer.pleintekst.nl:70
gopher://cramer.pleintekst.nl</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>1.20</nbr>
<nbr>1.21</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; Political Work in the Aftermath of the New Media Arts Crisis</subject>
<from>carlos katastrofsky</from>
<to>nettime-l@kein.org</to>
@ -3059,7 +3059,7 @@ http://katastrofsky.cont3xt.net
http://cont3xt.net</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>1.21</nbr>
<nbr>1.22</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; Political Work in the Aftermath of the New Media Arts Crisis</subject>
<from>Station Rose</from>
<to>nettime-l@kein.org</to>
@ -3114,7 +3114,7 @@ MAK Vienna_sold
* new: "Interstellar Overdrive CD" Japan release (2.09)</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>1.26</nbr>
<nbr>1.23</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; Political Work in the Aftermath of the New Media Arts Crisis</subject>
<from>John Hopkins</from>
<to>nettime-l@kein.org</to>

28
xml/8.TacticalMedia.xml
View File

@ -3469,7 +3469,7 @@ http://www.parecon.org
Ben</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>10.9</nbr>
<nbr>10.8</nbr>
<subject>RE: &lt;nettime&gt; the language of tactical media</subject>
<from>W R E Reynolds</from>
<to>nettime-l@bbs.thing.net</to>
@ -3519,7 +3519,7 @@ W. Richard Reynolds de La Rochelle
journalist / author / polemicist</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>10.10</nbr>
<nbr>10.9</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; the language of tactical media</subject>
<from>Benjamin Geer</from>
<to>nettime-l@bbs.thing.net</to>
@ -6518,7 +6518,7 @@ be made?
possible is already partly real, I am indeed a utopian ... a partisan</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>18.4</nbr>
<nbr>18.3</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; From Tactical Media to Digital Multitudes</subject>
<from>McKenzie Wark</from>
<to>nettime-l@bbs.thing.net</to>
@ -6560,7 +6560,7 @@ formation.
k</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>18.5</nbr>
<nbr>18.4</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; From Tactical Media to Digital Multitudes</subject>
<from>Kermit Snelson</from>
<to>nettime-l@bbs.thing.net</to>
@ -6677,7 +6677,7 @@ Berkeley, 1990, p.73
[5] Lovink, _op.cit._, p.26</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>18.6</nbr>
<nbr>18.5</nbr>
<subject>A Possible World is Virtual (was: &lt;nettime&gt; From Tactical Media toDigital Multitudes)</subject>
<from>Gabriel Pickard</from>
<to>nettime-l@bbs.thing.net</to>
@ -6748,7 +6748,7 @@ http://werg.demokratica.de
werGf314</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>18.7</nbr>
<nbr>18.6</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; From Tactical Media to Digital Multitudes</subject>
<from>Are Flagan</from>
<to>nettime-l@bbs.thing.net</to>
@ -6769,7 +6769,7 @@ as close as my eye is to me."
-af</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>18.8</nbr>
<nbr>18.7</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; From Tactical Media to Digital Multitudes</subject>
<from>David Garcia</from>
<to>nettime-l@bbs.thing.net</to>
@ -6866,7 +6866,7 @@ the concerns of structure usually reserved for conversations about
music.</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>18.9</nbr>
<nbr>18.8</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; From Tactical Media to Digital Multitudes</subject>
<from>Brian Holmes</from>
<to>nettime-l@bbs.thing.net</to>
@ -6997,7 +6997,7 @@ everyone else is living too.
Brian Holmes</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>18.10</nbr>
<nbr>18.9</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; From Tactical Media to Digital Multitudes</subject>
<from>Are Flagan</from>
<to>nettime-l@bbs.thing.net</to>
@ -7058,7 +7058,7 @@ on.
-af</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>18.11</nbr>
<nbr>18.10</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; From Tactical Media to Digital Multitudes</subject>
<from>Keith Hart</from>
<to>nettime-l@bbs.thing.net</to>
@ -7119,7 +7119,7 @@ words of three syllables (expressing the poetry of an intellectual class).
Keith Hart</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>18.12</nbr>
<nbr>18.11</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; From Tactical Media to Digital Multitudes</subject>
<from>porculus</from>
<to>nettime-l@bbs.thing.net</to>
@ -9220,7 +9220,7 @@ Think. Green. Do.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>24.14</nbr>
<nbr>24.3</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; The alt-right and the death of countercultur</subject>
<from>Felix Stalder</from>
<to>nettime-l@kein.org</to>
@ -9293,7 +9293,7 @@ majority for the repeal of Obama care.
</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>24.15</nbr>
<nbr>24.4</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; The alt-right and the death of countercultur</subject>
<from>Keith Hart</from>
<to>nettime-l@kein.org</to>
@ -9306,7 +9306,7 @@ majority for the repeal of Obama care.
# {AT} nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:</content>
</mail>
<mail>
<nbr>24.17</nbr>
<nbr>24.5</nbr>
<subject>Re: &lt;nettime&gt; The alt-right and the death of countercultur</subject>
<from>David Garcia</from>
<to>nettime-l@kein.org</to>

1181
xml/9.List_talking_to List.xml
View File

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff